Lie #1: Reliable information
about Jakub Regulski
At the very beginning, I would like to refer to the phrase "reliable information" that an anonymous hater used on his fake website.
A snippet of text from a hate website (translated from the original Polish version)
For the word "reliable" in the mouth of an Internet criminal and thief who hides his identity and falsifies information sounds at least like a bad joke or is a manifestation of his total stupidity and cynicism. An anonymous coward, hiding his identity, a thief without a face or name who steals personal information and photos, appeals to credibility? Seriously? 🤣 🤣 🤣
Is anyone still capable of believing in the "reliability" of an anonymous hater who impersonates others, steals identities, hacks into social media accounts, publishes lying and manipulated comments and finally so on "purely on his own" initiative creates an elaborate and costly hater website? Does a reliable and honest citizen, in order to avoid responsibility, hide from law enforcement, use stolen personal information to register services, spend crores to mask his online activities by paying for it with cryptocurrencies, register a website server outside the EU? Does a "reliable" person, acting alone, cooperate with Internet trolls and hire copywriters and whisperers? Is it "reliable" to bury the truth and facts, ignore the documents presented, and repeat the same lying slogans a hundred times over? I leave the answer to this question to the readers.
To criticize, condemn and complain can any fool - and most fools do it.
- Dale Carnegie
Lie #2: Manipulation of comments, or the anatomy of hateful social engineering
An overwhelming amount of information, with bold headlines and screenshots, attacking us from all sides. This is the picture that emerges when one first comes into contact with the hater website attacking Jakub Regulski. What is it all about here? On the main page a picture of Jakub Regulski, in the address his name and suddenly, not matching all the rest negative content and comments about him. This is exactly the effect that the paid online hater group specializing in disinformation, sowing hate speech and discrediting individuals and companies on the Internet wanted to achieve. The sudden attack with headlines, flashy slogans and screenshots with bright highlights is a sociotechnical procedure designed to induce shock therapy in the reader, to fix in his mind a manipulated and untrue massage about Jakub Regulski, taking advantage of the fact that most Internet users do not have time to delve into the details basing their judgment only on bold headlines, flashy images and photos. Therefore, I decided to carefully analyze the content published on the hater website attacking Jakub Regulski in order to prove to readers that they are victims of social engineering aimed at achieving certain goals, views through manipulation of society. And here's the evidence.
The table shows the number of repetitions of single comments published on hater's website
A detailed analysis of all the anonymous comments published on the hater's website revealed the scale of the lie and manipulation perpetrated by the anonymous hater. For, counting on the reader's confusion and fatigue, the online sociopath repeatedly deliberately duplicates the lying comments already used, doing so in a way that is unnoticeable to most users, while changing the places where the text is marked and cutting out parts of it so that they fit in with the subsequent sussed out lying theses. The scale of manipulation is enormous. An analysis of the comments published on the hater website showed that the sum of the occurrences of all the comments with their repetitions is as high as 167 of which 104 comments were intentionally repeated!!! 104 comments!!! So, the sum of all single non-repeated comments equals 63 and not 167. 🤯 🤯 🤯
Further analysis showed, moreover, that the publication dates of the 2 comments of users employee
and Gummy
blatantly do not match the periods of employment of me in the company whose employees allegedly published them, which did not prevent the online hater from repeating them another 11 times in order to artificially increase the scale and duration of the hater's intrigue. Thus, the original total of single unrepeated comments minus the 2 described above and not matching the period of employment equals now 61 comments!!! 61 single unrepeated comments, not 167 as the online hater would like.
The table shows the repetition records of single comments published on the hater website
The above table best illustrates the scale of lies, manipulation and social engineering tricks used by the anonymous online hater to confuse and mislead his audience. Records of repeating single comments are as high as 10 times!!! 😱 😱 😱 All this to create an effect of scale, to mislead the public by creating a false image of Jakub Regulski according to the Geobbels' theory that (…) a lie repeated a thousand times will become the truth (…)
.
The table shows the percentage of single comments published in a period of 11 months only and allegedly by employees of the same company in relation to all single comments published on the hater website
However, it doesn't stop there. As the above table shows, as many as 52 of the remaining 61 single comments were published in a period of just 11 months!!! The 52 single out of context anonymous comments represent as much as 85% of the total!!! 😳 😳 😳 Moreover, all these comments were posted exclusively by anonymous users of a forum dedicated to the same company!!!🧐 🧐 🧐
A detailed analysis of the content of the comments posted on the hater site further revealed that just 21 😱 😱 😱 of the remaining 61 are negative comments, containing only critical or offensive content toward the potential recipient.
And finally only 1, exactly 1, of the 61 remaining single comments refers directly to Jakub Regulski. 🤯 🤯 🤯 It is worth mentioning that this single comment remains the only negative comment referring to my person, written by an anonymous employee of the company where I worked for more than 4 years, and where several hundred people were employed during that time, including several managers and Directors.
The table shows the number of single and exclusively negative comments, including only 1 comment referring directly to Jakub Regulski
In summary: As many as 104 of the 167 comments posted on the hater website were intentionally repeated. Records of repeated comments are up to 10 times!!! The sum of the remaining unrepeated comments is 61. 52 of 61 i.e. 85% of the comments were written over a period of 11 months and by anonymous users of a forum dedicated to the same company. Only 21 out of 61 single unrepeated comments are negative comments. Only 1 of the 61 comments refers directly to Jakub Regulski.
Lie #3: A holistic portrait of Jakub Regulski as a Manager
The statement holistic portrait of Jakub Regulski
is another in a long list of lies and manipulation by an anonymous online hater. Another pathetic attempt at high profile fake news that is actually not true and doesn't matter at all. In order to better illustrate the scale and mechanism of the fraud we are dealing with here, I will again use the results of the previously conducted analysis.
The table shows the percentage of single unrepeated comments published in a period of 11 months only and allegedly by employees of the same company in relation to all single comments published on the hater website
As can be seen from the table above, as many as 52 of the 61 total single non-repeatable comments posted on the hater website were written over a period of only 11 months and by anonymous users of a forum dedicated to the same company. In addition, the comments by users employee
and Gummy
were written in a forum dedicated to the company where I ended up working many months earlier. Another 2 comments by users "Leszek" and "zdziś" were written while I was still an employee of the company, while their content refers to the fact of departure of unspecified people.
All this is done to manipulate the audience, give a false impression of scale and, most importantly, to deliberately expand the scope of the publication of comments so that another lie already visually fits into a pre-planned online hater scenario. But here, too, the online hater once again makes a mistake and, getting lost in his own lies, publishes contradictory information saying that the opinions come from a period of 4 years and then 5 years of work.
The snippet presents a false, contradictory information below about the alleged publication period of comments on Jakub Regulski (translated from the original Polish version)
The snippet shows another false, contradictory information about the alleged period of publication of comments on Jakub Regulski published on the same hater website (translated from the original Polish version)
In fact, however, the false comments published by the online hater relate to a total period of 14 months in that 85% of them were written in a period of 11 months only and by anonymous users of a forum dedicated to the same company. 14 months against more than 15 years of exemplary work which, after adding 5 years of study, gives a total of more than 20 years of work experience!!! So, contrary to the lying claims of the online hater, this is not a holistic portrait of Jakub Regulski as a Manager
and only a small part of it built on the basis of only 61 anonymous and repeated 167 times comments in order to manipulate and deceive the audience. Meanwhile, only 21 of them are negative comments against the potential recipient and only and only 1 comment refers directly to the person of Jakub Regulski. I leave the conclusions to the readers.
Lie #4: Non-accidental gaps in the biography of Jakub Regulski
At this point, I would like to draw the readers' special attention to a very interesting thread confirming yet another online hater's lies and manipulations. Let's look again at the following lying post published by the online hater. Among the names of the companies listed below, there is one company missing, equally important, where I was also employed as a Director.
The snippet presents manipulated, incomplete information about the order of the companies in which Jakub Regulski was employed (translated from the original Polish version)
What happened? Why did the online hater hide this fact? The answer is simple. As I mentioned earlier, groups engaged in paid online hate precede their actions with thorough surveillance of victims on the Internet, they search social media, job sites but most importantly the National Court Register and from there they derive the most important knowledge about the victim's professional activities. The problem was that the above-mentioned company that the online hater omitted was not Polish and, unlike other companies, I was not a member of the board of directors, proxy or any other role requiring registration in the Polish National Court Register. There was also a lack of negative comments about me, and since they could not be backwardly published, the online hater decided to deliberately omit this important detail from the audience, using it to artificially extend the publication period of false comments from 1 year to 4 or 5 years. He wanted to achieve an artificial effect of scale, and in truth he only proved once again that he is a common liar and manipulator.
Lie #5: Fake accounts and usernames
Clever Zbys
, Helpful Zbys
, Santa Claus
, Princey
, Laser99
or Gummy
are just some examples of the names of comment authors that an anonymous hater used as a "reliable" source of information on the hater website he created. De facto, the entire message posted on it is based solely on such anonymous and manipulated comments, none of which are grounded in facts or documents. In view of the above, it is therefore difficult to speak of any credibility, both as to the anonymous comments and their authors. For, does a credible person impersonate other users, use false personal information, hide his identity with expensive Internet technologies?
Does a normal citizen, who has a job, who has a family and the responsibilities that go with it, devote his life to creating hatful websites, publishing fake news, out of context blogs, spend crores on paying internet trolls, whisperers and copywriters? Does a "reliable" person falsify comments, lie, manipulate using twisted social engineering? Of course not!!! No one in their right mind with the logic of a common sense person builds his views and opinions on the basis of lying and manipulated opinions of "Gummy" or "Clever Zbys". Talking to the wind makes no sense. The word of an anonymous online hater against the word and documents presented by Jakub Regulski, but the difference is that I am not afraid to show my face, and I do not hide my identity because I have nothing to hide, I am a strong, honest and proud manager, repeatedly awarded for his professional activities as evidenced by numerous references, prestigious awards and honors.
Do not discuss with an idiot! First he will bring you down to his level, and then he will beat you with experience....
- Mark Twain
One of the most important arguments confirming the manipulations and lies of the online hater is that. only 1 of the comments repeated 167 times on the hater site refers directly to me. Only 1!!! As in the case of made-up usernames, the manipulated comments in most cases have no addressee or refer to unspecified people described by the job title or also offensive phrases. Thus, it is difficult to treat seriously the evidence in the form of manipulated comments, whose authors are "Gummy," "Clever Zbys" and "Santa Claus," especially when their contents have no addressee or refer to the phrases "Baldy," "Jug," "Manager" or "Director." Also noteworthy is the fact that in the companies where I have worked so far, the management structure was often diverse, highly elaborate and frequently changed. Moreover, they employed a total of more than 800 people, including dozens of Directors, Managers, Leaders and Managers, many of whom had very short haircuts. Thus, the term "Baldy", " Jug" and "Director" or the absolute lack of address can apply to literally any employee especially given the fact that we are dealing with online manipulation. In order to better highlight yet another hater's manipulation, I will use comments from the same source as the comments published on the hater website. The difference, however, is that the following comments were written many months and even more than a year after the period of my employment with the company whose employees allegedly wrote them.
The snippet shows a comment referring to "Baldy" and coming from a forum dedicated to the company with which I ended my cooperation many months earlier (source: Serwis Gowork.pl)(translated from the original Polish version)
The snippet shows another comment referring again to "Baldy" and coming from the forum dedicated to the company with which I ended my cooperation over a year earlier (source: Serwis Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
As you can easily notice, the anonymous authors of the comments, using the nicknames "Mariuszek" and "Kamilek" in a mocking manner criticize the person they call "Baldy." The same name in order to associate with my person was also used by a online hater slandering me. The problem is that the above comments were written several years after I left the company and so, as the example provided shows, the person slandered is certainly not Jakub Regulski. It can be literally anyone!!! I leave the conclusions, as always, to the readers.
The content of the above quote is already another example of the lies and clumsy attempt at manipulation used by an anonymous online hater to discredit my person. Obviously, both the claim suggesting a sudden drop in the number of comments after I terminated my former employers and the claim that I would be fired from more companies are unsupported lies and slander. In order to prove that once again we are dealing with an online hater's mystification, I made a detailed analysis of the comments published on the same forums from which the anonymous online hater attacking me drew his inspiration. The results of the analysis unequivocally confirm that, once again, we are dealing with a simple lie. The number of negative comments has not decreased at all. On the contrary, the same job site that the anonymous online hater keeps referring to is bursting with negative comments about former employers. So let's take a look at some examples. The following comments are from a forum dedicated to the company where I was employed until October 2018 and so, obviously, they cannot apply to me since they were written several years after that period.
Sample snippets of comments from a forum dedicated to the company with which I ended my cooperation in October 2018, published many months or even more than a year after that period (source: Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
Another example shows comments from a forum dedicated to the company where I was employed until May 2020. As you can easily see these comments were written many months or even more than a year after that date and so obviously I could not have been the addressee.
Sample snippets of comments from a forum dedicated to the company with which I ended my cooperation in May 2020, published many months or even more than a year after that period (source: Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
What's more, as can be seen from the above statements, negative comments about former employers continue to be published and their number has not decreased at all!!! Moreover, Many of the comments have been deleted and it was me, after all, that the anonymous online hater accused of deleting them!!! Example? You are very welcome.
Examples of deleted comments from a forum dedicated to one of Jakub Regulski's former employers (source: Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
In summary, the examples presented above provide clear evidence of yet another lie by an anonymous online hater. The number of comments after I left the companies, contrary to the lying claims of the online hater, has not decreased. On the contrary, the number of comments has increased!!! And if that's the case, why doesn't the anonymous hater build hater sites about former employers or the people to whom the comments apply? I leave the conclusions, as always, to the readers.
Lie #8: Employees' reactions to the news of Jakub Regulski's dismissal from following companies
Another lie by an anonymous online hater suggesting that I was about to be fired from more companies where I was previously employed. Total nonsense. Firstly, no serious company fires a man whom it has previously repeatedly rewarded and promoted, a man thanks to whom the company grows and brings even more profits. An example? Here you go.
Lean Award from one of the world's largest automotive companies
Award "Employee of the Year 2017" / "Employee of the Year 2017" received from the owner of the company
Diploma of appreciation for preparing and achieving the best ever management system audit result at one of the world's largest automotive companies (translated from the original Polish version)
Award for positive work evaluation from the Company's Board of Directors - December 2019 (translated from the original Polish version)
Secondly, if you fire someone from more companies than you don't give them perfect references. This is illogical.
Sample snippets of positive references for Jakub Regulski received from former employers
Thirdly, the statement suggesting that I was fired from more companies directly contradicts my work experience. This is because I spent a total of more than 11 years in the largest automotive companies, including as many as 7 years in one and 4.5 years in another. Does an employer who wants to fire an employee often promote him and offer employment before so many years? Total nonsense!
Fourth, to prove that, contrary to the lying claims of the anonymous online hater, I was not "fired from successive companies" I present sample snippets of 3 successive employment certificates dating from September 2005 to October 2018 and therefore over 13 years of service. As can be seen from each of the 3 employment certificates presented below, the employment relationship terminated as a result of termination by mutual agreement or by my termination. Additional comments in this case are probably unnecessary.
Employment certificate of Jakub Regulski from the automotive company where he was employed for 6 years and 8 months (translated from the original Polish version)
Employment certificate of Jakub Regulski from the automotive company where he was employed for 4 years and 6 months (translated from the original Polish version)
Employment certificate of Jakub Regulski from the company where he was employed for 2 years (translated from the original Polish version)
And finally, fifth, an example of the real reactions of employees to the news of my resignation. A certificate of appreciation from the staff and a compilation of more than 100 real positive comments about me published by employees, appreciating both the management style I present, my ability to build relationships, the excellent working atmosphere and my successful implementation of improvements. I leave the conclusions, as always, to the readers.
Employee thanks for their cooperation, commitment and the enormous positive energy I brought to the team
Sample snippets from over 100 positive comments on the management style and pro-employee approach presented by Jakub Regulski (source: Serwis Gowork.pl)(translated from the original Polish version)
Lie #9: allegations of falsification of comments
Sometimes a man thinks that he has already seen the bottom of human stupidity, but then he meets someone through whom he learns that this well has no bottom after all
- Stephen King
The above words perfectly describe the level of absurdity and stupidity we are dealing with when reading into yet another lie and slander concocted by an Internet sociopath. An anonymous online hater accuses me of falsifying comments? Really? From the mouth of an anonymous criminal, it sounds at least like a very weak joke. A faceless hater who runs from justice, hides his identity, steals personal information and photos of others, registers services in false names paying for them with cryptocurrencies, publishes fake news, lying comments and opinions still has the audacity to talk about reliability and accuse me of falsifying comments. And all this for the money of a revenge-hungry fallen businessman. Mercy!!! I don't think anyone in their right mind can believe this nonsense.
Also, noteworthy is the fact that the title thread accusing me of allegedly falsifying comments appeared on the hater site relatively recently. Why? Because in response to the anonymous and manipulated comments published on the hater site, I decided to create my own website jakubregulski.com and publish on it more than 100 positive comments from employees about me. More than 100 genuine comments against anonymous, manipulated comments that do not refer to my person.
Sample snippets from over 100 positive comments on the management style and pro-employee approach presented by Jakub Regulski (source: Serwis Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
Sample snippets of positive comments on the approach to employee safety and working conditions presented by Jakub Regulski (source: Serwis Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
As a result, in view of the enormity of the arguments I presented, including more than 100 positive comments about me, the anonymous online hater decided to go into denial, ignoring the numerous pieces of evidence discrediting him and lying by doubling the amount of repeated nonsense and the size of their font.
After all, when caught by the hand, the thief shouts the loudest "catch the thief!!!". He gets caught, then says it's not his hand. Word against word. Only with the small difference that I am not afraid to hide my face and name and take the challenge with my head held high. He, hides, is afraid to show his face and attacks from hiding. He acts on behalf of and with the sponsor's money. Anonymous, a coward, a thief and a liar. Is this the definition of " reliability "? I leave it to the readers to judge.
In order to address yet another lie about deleting comments, I decided to re-examine the website from which all the anonymous comments published by the hater came. The results leave no illusions. Comments are indeed "deleted" and censored, but their publication dates extend significantly beyond the period of my employment with the companies involved. As proof, I present examples of 6 deleted comments whose publication date significantly differs from the period of my employment with the company whose employees allegedly published them.
Examples of deleted comments from a forum dedicated to one of Jakub Regulski's former employers (source: Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
Below are further examples of comments whose authors directly accuse their former employer of deleting comments, censorship, and constantly swamping the forum with photos and ads to hide problems. What's more, these comments were published in a forum dedicated to the company with which I ended my cooperation many months or even more than a year earlier.
Examples of still appearing negative comments published on the forum of the company with which I ended cooperation many months or even more than a year earlier (source: Serwis Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
Thus, the above actions of deleting comments, censoring them, and accusing the forum of pictures and advertising content could not be and are not the result of my actions contrary to the hater's lying claims. The arguments above, therefore, perfectly capture the biased and manipulative style of the anonymous liar. It involves the constant repetition of the same lies while deliberately ignoring and "shouting down" the facts presented. Like the proverbial thief who, when caught by the hand, shouts that it is not his hand. But why does the online hater attack me specifically and not others affected by the negative content? Why does he spend so much time and money attacking my person? The answer is simple, All this propaganda and lies about me is purely for profit and on behalf of a dishonest businessman.
Finally, I would like to show one more amusing proof of the stupidity and arrogance of an anonymous online hater who got so lost in his lies and falsehoods that he published the following anonymous " It's great" user comment as proof of my alleged deletion of content. The problem, however, is that the comment below was never deleted, contrary to the suggestions of its author. No comment.
Example of an undeleted comment accusing of their deletion published on a forum dedicated to the company where I was employed at the time 🤣🤣🤣 (source: Serwis Gowork.pl) (translated from the original Polish version)
